Sylmar Branch Los Angeles Library
Sylmar Branch Los Angeles Library
Firm: Hodgetts + Fung
Credit: Hodgetts + Fung
Logo  
Submittal Guidelines
Eligibility
Fees
Schedule
Categories
Terms & Conditions
FAQ
Jury
Registration
Manual Payment
Contact
Awards
2008 Design Awards Entries
2008 Design Awards: Google Map
2008 Design Awards Committee
Categories
  

 AIACC Awards for Architecture
AIACC Awards for Interior Architecture
Maybeck Award
25-Year Award
AIACC/CCASLA Awards for Urban Design

Savings By Design Energy Efficiency Integration Awards

   
  AIACC Awards for Architecture
    Projects must be completed within the past 8 years. There are several subcategories that fall under Awards for Architecture. These categories are only for internal filing purposes and an award may not be given in each sub category. They include Commercial, Institutional/Educational, Residential, Mixed-Use, Historic Preservation, Adaptive Reuse/Renovation, and Other.
    Entries are welcomed and encouraged from both established and new practitioners and designers and from small firms and large. New buildings and renovations/restorations are eligible.
    Non-residential entries in this category can simultaneously be entered in the Savings By Design category (see below)
    Projects must be submitted in one of the following two categories:
   
  1. Design resolution, which demonstrates exemplary skill and sensitivity in resolution of formal, functional, and technical requirements
  2. Design advancement, which furthers the contemporary understanding of design by proposing new approaches to the development of architectural form
    In addition to design achievements, projects may be exemplary in the following subcategories:
   
  • Technical advancement, which explores new technologies and their architectural applications
  • Environmental advancement, which demonstrates a commitment to environmentally sensitive design and conservation
  • Preservation/restoration, which demonstrates skill, sensitivity, and thoughtfulness in preservation, restoration, or the alternative reuse of existing buildings regardless of their original architectural intentions
   
  AIACC Awards for Interior Architecture
    The AIACC Awards for Interior Architecture acknowledge the excellence of building interiors. The intent of this awards program is to draw attention to the broad diversity of completed interior architecture. Entries may be large or small in scope and may involve renovation, adaptive use, or new construction. Submissions in the areas of residential, institutional, commercial, corporate, retail, hospitality, and miscellaneous are encouraged. All entries are judged on merit regardless of scale or budget.
    Entries in this category can simultaneously be entered in the "Savings By Design" category (see below).
    Each entry in the Awards for Interior Architecture is judged for the success with which the project has met its individual requirements.  The size and location of a project in no way limit its eligibility.
    Projects must be submitted in one of the following two categories:
   
  1. Design resolution, which demonstrates exemplary skill and sensitivity in resolution of formal, functional, and technical requirements
  2. Design advancement, which furthers the contemporary understanding of design by proposing new approaches to the development of architectural form
    In addition to design achievements, projects may be exemplary in the following subcategories:
   
  • Technical advancement, which explores new technologies and their architectural applications
  • Environmental advancement, which demonstrates a commitment to environmentally sensitive design and conservation
  • Preservation/restoration, which demonstrates skill, sensitivity, and thoughtfulness in preservation, restoration, or the alternative reuse of existing buildings regardless of their original architectural intentions
   
  Maybeck Award
    The Maybeck Award recognizes outstanding achievement in architectural design as expressed in a body of work produced by an individual architect over a period of at least 10 years. The award is intended to honor the individual rather than the firm. The basis for the award is the quality of the body of work, consistently designed, during one’s career.
   
  • The Maybeck Award is not considered a Lifetime Achievement Award. If you are interested in nominating or applying for the AIACC Lifetime Achievement Award for Distinguished Service, Call for Entries will be available Fall 2008.
  • The Maybeck Award is not a Firm Award. Firm principals who are nominees should include images of individual designs, not firm designs per se.
  • Include photographic images of completed projects that represent a breadth of experience and a range of projects.
  • On the graphic images provided please include the name of the project, the project type (i.e., residential home, church, museum, etc), and the year the project was completed.
  • We encourage creativity. You may produce montage images that showcase more than one image on a photograph. However, we recommend that this be done in such a way that individual details and characteristics are not lost.
    In the Descriptive Data section, provide a comprehensive biographical sketch of the nominee or information describing the project. Please address issues such as strengths, challenges, management, social concerns and community involvement, etc. as deemed appropriate for the Maybeck Award.
    Nominees for the Maybeck Award should include photographs that represent a breadth of experience.
   
  25-Year Award
    The 25-Year Award is intended to recognize distinguished California architecture of enduring significance which has retained its central form and character, with the architectural integrity of the project intact. All entries must be located in California and completed 25 to 50 years ago, after January 1, 1958 and before January 1, 1983.
    We encourage creativity. You may produce montage images that showcase more than one image on a photograph. However, we recommend that this be done in such a way that individual details and characteristics are not lost.
    In the Descriptive Data section, provide a comprehensive biographical sketch of the nominee or information describing the project. Please address issues such as strengths, challenges, management, social concerns and community involvement, etc. as deemed appropriate for the 25-Year Award.
   
  AIACC/CCASLA Awards for Urban Design
   

The 2008 Awards for Urban Design program will be administered jointly by the American Institute of Architects California Council (AIACC) and the California Chapters of the American Society of Landscape Architects (CCASLA).  Awards will be given to recognize excellence in the creation and improvement of our physical environment by Architects and Landscape Architects.

Urban Design is defined for the awards program as the realm of physical design encompassing master planning and landscape plans to conceptual architectural design.  This definition includes research and the design of spaces at all scales: from places between buildings to regional master plans.  It looks at time from the conception and expression of an idea to the many phases of a master plan.

The 2008 Urban Design Awards program will look at a wide spectrum of design and work in the following areas:
   
  1. Environments between and among buildings,
  2. Built and landscape environments around and on top of structures,
  3. Realms in time between idea and construction, and of long or short duration,
  4. The natural environment, the human constructed environment, and combinations and junctures of the two,
  5. Public and private works and the combination of the two,
  6. Information and design for and by the public sector and the development sector,
  7. Design and research, built work and publications,
  8. Projects small and large,
  9. Expanse of time from concepts and thoughts to built or partially built, and
  10. Experience of daytime, nighttime and the four seasons.
    Special criteria and requirements:
   
  1. Work(s) can be projects, designs, plans, papers and publications.
  2. Areas of projects can include campuses, transit centers, resorts, downtowns, town centers, parts of cities, neighborhoods, parks, trails, and open space.
  3. The project description must include a description of the important urban design and landscape architecture concepts.
  4. Submissions cannot include public relations materials.
  5. Submissions must include an aerial photograph or site plan with a clear depiction of the area of the work, a north arrow and a scale.
  6. The time period(s) of the project must be clearly stated.
  7. Submissions must include a brief statistical summary of areas and counts for the work(s).
   
  Savings By Design Energy Efficiency Integration Awards
    A winning combination deserves winning recognition.
   

Resource efficiency, responsibility for environment, human productivity, and quality of life are essential benefits of well-designed buildings. Of the design professionals entrusted with creating significant spaces, only a few achieve a rare combination of superlative design and creativity, environmental sensitivity, and innovative energy efficiency solutions.

By making that extra effort to aim beyond minimum energy performance codes, design teams produce many benefits, not only for clients, but also for building occupants and the public:

  • Owners enjoy lower operating costs and higher property values.
  • Occupants gain greater comfort, health, and productivity.
  • The public is rewarded with cleaner air due to reduced power plant emissions.
    In the Project Description, include details of:
   
  • Site Characteristics
  • Site Context
  • Client Profile
  • Project Size (square footage of building and size of site area)
  • Title 24 compliance margin
    Include an Expanded Narrative:
    Provide a narrative describing how the project masterfully integrates energy efficiency and sustainable strategies into building design to achieve architectural excellence.  Please summarize the project’s energy efficiency integration efforts including a description of the projects operations in relation to energy efficiency, and the unique solutions to the project’s specific challenges. The purpose of this narrative is to provide the jury with meaningful information beyond the visual characteristics of the project such as:
   
  • Design Intent
  • Energy Efficiency Achievements
  • Sustainability Strategies
  • Technological Advancement
  • Interior Environment Quality
  • Team Coordination      
  • Integrated Design Solutions
  • Site & Urban Sensitivity
  • Space Programming & Flexibility
  • Resource and Materials Conservation
  • Research and Technology
  • Social Concerns
  • Other Lessons Learned
    Design Features:
    Specifically describe, separately, how the envelope, mechanical systems, lighting and other design features and/or strategies contribute to the energy efficiency of the project.
    Energy Savings:
    Describe the energy savings achieved in comparison to the standard Title-24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and attach  a one-page energy model performance summary (i.e.: Energy-Pro PERF-1 Report). 
   

 


     




 Log in to your
Submittal Work Area
Please use the contact form, if
you encounter any problem
User Name
Password
Forgot your password?